Translate

Senior International Correspondence Chess Master (SIM) ICCF

Senior International Correspondence Chess Master (SIM) ICCF 2005

czwartek, 1 sierpnia 2019

Interesting game from http://www.ianchessgambits.com



[Event "IECG CP.2001.Q.00020 email"] [Site "IECG email"] [Date "2002.10.01"] [Round "?"] [White "Garibaldi, Lucio Manuel"] [Black "Krol, Wladyslaw"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "C44"] [WhiteElo "1884"] [BlackElo "2263"] [PlyCount "62"] [EventDate "2002.10.01"] [EventType "tourn (corr)"] [EventRounds "10"] [EventCountry "POL"] [SourceTitle "Corr 2008"] [Source "ChessBase"] [SourceDate "2008.06.24"] [SourceVersion "1"] [SourceVersionDate "2008.06.24"] [SourceQuality "1"] 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 exd4 4. c3 dxc3 5. Nxc3 Bc5 6. Bc4 (6. Bg5 {will transpose in most cases, but Black also has the surprisingly strong} Be7 $5) 6... d6 {This is the most reliable follow-up to 5...Bc5.} 7. Bg5 {White attacks the black queen, encouraging Black to put the knight on g8 in the way, resulting in it being placed in an awkward pin.} Nge7 {This is probably the best reply, even though it results in being pinned. Black can swiftly castle kingside and can eventually break the pin with ...Qd7 or ...Qe8.} 8. Nd5 $6 { [#]} (8. O-O {is preferable, getting the king off the e-file, and then White will typically follow up with Nc3-d5. Often it will transpose to the previous game after} O-O 9. Nd5 Be6 {but this line is relatively unexplored, and Black does have some alternatives at move 8 and 9, such as 8...h6 9.Bh4 and then 9... 0-0 or 9...Bg4.}) (8. Qc2 {followed by 0-0-0 is another idea, with the idea of storming the black kingside with the kingside pawns, but it seems that Black's resources against this are very good, particularly the possibility of a well-timed ...Ne7-g6. The bishop on g5 can get in the way of the advance of the h-pawn (if kicked back to h4) or the g-pawn (if kicked back to g3).} h6 9. Bh4 O-O 10. O-O-O Qe8 {with the idea of ...Ng6, for example.}) 8... f6 $6 { This is rather weakening and can be met by a strong piece sacrifice.} (8... h6 $1 {is the reason why White should not play 8.Nd5.} 9. Bh4 g5 $1 10. Nf6+ (10. Bg3 Nxd5 11. exd5 Qe7+ {is an inconvenient check for White, illustrating the benefit of getting the king out of the way of any such trouble with 8.0-0}) 10... Kf8 {and although White has caught the black king in the centre, Black is better, as Black threatens ...g5-g4 or ...Bc8-g4, as well as the immediate threat to take the bishop on h4. Indeed, in this position White's best practical chance is probably to sac the knight on g5:} 11. Nxg5 hxg5 12. Bxg5 { , but White's attacking chances are not worth a piece.}) 9. Bxf6 $5 {This was another of Paul Keres's piece sacrifice suggestions.} ({Somewhat less effective is} 9. Nxf6+ $2 gxf6 10. Bxf6 Rf8) 9... gxf6 10. Nxf6+ Kf8 11. Qc1 { [#] Black now has to be very careful.} Ng8 12. Nh5 $6 {Probably not the best, as there is a risk of the knight being shut out of play here.} (12. Nd5 { appears to be untested, but was suggested by "George Jempty" at the Chesspublishing.com forum, and gives White enough compensation for the piece.}) 12... Qe7 13. Qf4+ Ke8 14. Bxg8 $6 (14. O-O-O {would have given White rather better chances of building an attack, but White is now struggling to get enough of an attack going for the piece in any case.}) 14... Rxg8 15. Nf6+ Kf8 16. Ng5 {[#]} Rxg5 $1 17. Nxh7+ Kg7 (17... Ke8 {would have brought the king to a safer position, but Black might have been afraid of the possible discovered checks after} 18. Nf6+ Kf7 {whereupon} 19. Nd5+ Rf5 $1 {is an important resource for Black, exploiting the pin on the e4-pawn.}) 18. Nxg5 Nd4 19. Rc1 Bf5 20. f3 Rf8 21. h4 Rf6 22. Qg3 Kh8 23. Rc3 d5 24. Kd1 dxe4 25. Nxe4 Bxe4 26. fxe4 Bd6 27. Qe3 Be5 28. Rd3 c5 29. Qg5 Qe6 30. Rc3 Bf4 31. Qh5+ Rh6 0-1

Brak komentarzy:

Prześlij komentarz